The Influence of Design for Manufacturing and Assembly on Production Efficiency and Product Quality; A Case Study of a 0.5 Inch Class 800LB Ball Valve
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jequi.v8i1.254Keywords:
manufacturing and assembly, production efficiency, product quality, ball valve, manufacturing designAbstract
Background: The manufacturing industry faces increasing pressure to enhance production efficiency while maintaining high product quality standards. Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA) has emerged as a critical methodology for addressing these challenges by integrating manufacturing and assembly considerations into the early design phase
Objective: This study aims to analyze the effect of implementing the Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA) approach on production efficiency and product quality in the manufacturing of a 0.5-inch Class 800LB Ball Valve.
Methods: The research adopts a quantitative approach with a comparative analysis between the initial design and the optimized design developed based on DFMA principles. Data were collected through direct observation of manufacturing and assembly processes, in-depth interviews with production engineers, and examination of technical documentation regarding process time, cost structure, and component quantity.
Results: The results show that applying DFMA significantly reduces assembly time by approximately 20%, decreases the number of non-value-added components, and simplifies the assembly sequence, which collectively enhance overall production efficiency. Furthermore, the redesigned product demonstrates improved quality consistency, lower assembly defect rates, and better structural reliability during performance testing. Integrating DFMA with Value Analysis and Value Engineering (VAVE) also contributes to a more cost-effective and sustainable manufacturing system by aligning design simplicity with functional performance.
Conclusion: The findings emphasize that DFMA is not only a tool for operational improvement but also a strategic design framework that supports competitiveness, lean production, and continuous improvement in industrial environments. Hence, DFMA implementation is recommended as a standardized design practice to achieve efficiency, quality assurance, and innovation within the manufacturing sector.
Downloads
References
Abrishami, S., & Martín-Durán, R. (2021). BIM and DfMA: a paradigm of new opportunities. Sustainability, 13(17), 9591.
AlKhader, W., Jayaraman, R., & Salah, K. (2025). Transformations in manufacturing quality in the Industry 4.0 era: A semi-centennial review using latent Dirichlet allocation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 201, 110633.
Almashaqbeh, S., & Munive Hernandez, J. (2024). Evaluation and improvement of a plastic production system using integrated OEE methodology: A case study. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 32(4), 450-463.
Butt, J., & Jedi, S. (2020). Redesign of an in-market conveyor system for manufacturing cost reduction and design efficiency using DFMA methodology. Designs, 4(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs4010006
Dhumal, A., Ambhore, N., Sanap, G., Patil, S., & Shinde, V. (2025). Investigating multi-directional flow dynamics in three-way ball valves: a CFD-based study. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 72, 61.
Dupuis, M., & Massicotte, A. (2025). Are new technologies empowering workers? Digital lean production and the reorganization of work in manufacturing. Work and Occupations, 52(3), 417-446.
Favi, C., Germani, M., & Mandolini, M. (2022). Design for manufacturing and assembly methods in the product development process of mechanical products: a systematic literature review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 121, 2289-2330.
Formentini, G., Rodriguez, N., & Favi, C. (2022). Design for manufacturing and assembly methods in the product development process of mechanical products: A systematic literature review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 120(5-6), 2899-2921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08837-6
Gerasimov, B. N., Vasyaycheva, V. A., & Gerasimov, K. B. (2018). Identification of the factors of competitiveness of industrial company based on the module approach. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(2), 677.
Laovisutthichai, V., & Lu, W. (2025). Design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) for modular buildings: an analytical framework. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1-15
Lu, W., Tan, T., Xu, J., Wang, J., Chen, K., Gao, S., & Xue, F. (2021). Design for manufacture and assembly (DfMA) in construction: The old and the new. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 17(1–2), 77–91.
Masroor, N., & Asim, M. (2019). SMEs in the contemporary era of global competition. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 632–641.
Montazeri, S., Lei, Z., & Odo, N. (2024). Design for manufacturing and assembly (DfMA) in construction: A holistic review of current trends and future directions. Buildings, 14(1), 285.
R. Miles, Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2015.
Rennels, D. C. (2022). Pipe flow: A practical and comprehensive guide. John Wiley & Sons.
Rijwani, T., Kumari, S., Srinivas, R., Abhishek, K., Iyer, G., & Vara, H. (2025). Value engineering in the era of Industry 4.0: From gap analysis to research methodologies and strategic framework. Intelligent and Sustainable Manufacturing, 2(2), 10029.
Shukla, P. (2023). Improving Design Efficiency and Reducing Manufacturing Time through DFMA Implementation: A Case Study of LED Bulb Design.
Wen, P., Wang, S., Li, J., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., & Liu, H. (2025). Multiobjective optimization of a pressure maintaining ball valve structure based on RSM and NSGA-II. Scientific Reports, 15, 21342.
Yu, R., Wu, Y., Chen, X., & Wu, X. (2023). Study on the design of ball valve based on elastic ring valve seat structure and fluid characteristics and fatigue strength. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 89, 102302.
Zare, M., Croq, M., Hossein‐Arabi, F., Brunet, R., & Roquelaure, Y. (2016). Does ergonomics improve product quality and reduce costs? A review article. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(2), 205–223.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Nur Apriady, Bambang Syairudin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



